# Which med spas does AI recommend in Chicago, IL?

AI Visibility Index, week of Friday, July 17, 2026.

Across the 24 questions Chicago, IL customers ask AI about Med spas, SpaDerma is named most. 4 of 4 assistants recommend it, for a 6.8% share of voice, the week of Friday, July 17, 2026.

## Visibility: who AI recommends most

1. SpaDerma: 6.8% share of voice, recommended by 4 of 4, depth 42/100
2. Luxura Med Spa: 5.1% share of voice, recommended by 4 of 4, not depth-scored
3. Old Town Med Spa: 4.7% share of voice, recommended by 4 of 4, depth 50/100
4. Pure Medical Spa: 3.9% share of voice, recommended by 4 of 4, depth 51/100
5. Skin Pharm: 3.8% share of voice, recommended by 1 of 4, depth 71/100
6. Cadella Medical Spa & Wellness Center: 3.1% share of voice, recommended by 4 of 4, not depth-scored
7. Chicago Aesthetics Med Spa: 2.9% share of voice, recommended by 4 of 4, not depth-scored
8. Wrinkle Fairy: 2.0% share of voice, recommended by 2 of 4, not depth-scored
9. Dvida Spa / Med Spa: 1.7% share of voice, recommended by 4 of 4, not depth-scored
10. Chicago Aesthetics Surgery & Med Spa: 1.6% share of voice, recommended by 3 of 4, not depth-scored
11. Innovative MedSpa: 1.6% share of voice, recommended by 3 of 4, not depth-scored
12. Northwestern Med Spa River North: 1.5% share of voice, recommended by 3 of 4, depth 49/100
13. Ethos MedSpa Chicago: 1.4% share of voice, recommended by 2 of 4, depth 71/100
14. HOUSE22 Med Spa in Chicago: 1.4% share of voice, recommended by 2 of 4, not depth-scored
15. Better Med Spa & Wellness: 1.3% share of voice, recommended by 4 of 4, depth 45/100
16. The Fitz Aesthetic Club: 1.3% share of voice, recommended by 2 of 4, not depth-scored
17. Linz Aesthetics Clinic: 1.0% share of voice, recommended by 2 of 4, not depth-scored
18. Express Med Spa: 1.0% share of voice, recommended by 2 of 4, not depth-scored
19. New Image Works: 0.9% share of voice, recommended by 4 of 4, not depth-scored
20. VIO Med Spa Chicago: 0.8% share of voice, recommended by 3 of 4, not depth-scored
21. LaserAway LLC: 0.8% share of voice, recommended by 3 of 4, not depth-scored
22. Chapter Aesthetic Studio: 0.8% share of voice, recommended by 3 of 4, not depth-scored
23. The Confidence Bar: 0.7% share of voice, recommended by 3 of 4, not depth-scored
24. ImageLab Med Spa: 0.7% share of voice, recommended by 3 of 4, not depth-scored
25. Natural Beauty Med Spa- Chicago: 0.7% share of voice, recommended by 3 of 4, not depth-scored

## Depth: who AI understands best

Recommended ≠ understood. SpaDerma ranks #1 for visibility but #8 on depth. AI's weakest link for it is pricing. High visibility with low depth is the riskiest combination for a business: customers arrive, then get the wrong expectations.

1. Ethos MedSpa Chicago: depth 71/100 (visibility #13) · weak point: Differentiation
2. Skin Pharm: depth 71/100 (visibility #5) · weak point: Differentiation
3. Pure Medical Spa: depth 51/100 (visibility #4) · weak point: Pricing
4. Old Town Med Spa: depth 50/100 (visibility #3) · weak point: Pricing
5. Beautify CHI Medspa: depth 50/100 (visibility #221) · weak point: Availability
6. Northwestern Med Spa River North: depth 49/100 (visibility #12) · weak point: Pricing
7. Better Med Spa & Wellness: depth 45/100 (visibility #15) · weak point: Pricing
8. SpaDerma: depth 42/100 (visibility #1) · weak point: Pricing

## Questions AI answers about Med spas in Chicago, IL

## Frequently asked questions

### Which med spa does AI recommend most in Chicago, IL?

SpaDerma, named by 4 of the four assistants, for a 6.8% share of voice across the 24 prompts. Next are Luxura Med Spa and Old Town Med Spa.

### Which med spa in Chicago, IL does AI understand best?

Ethos MedSpa Chicago scores highest on depth (71/100): assistants can accurately describe what it offers and help a customer toward a booking.

### Which med spas in Chicago, IL is AI getting wrong?

SpaDerma ranks #1 by visibility but only #8 on depth. AI's weakest link for it is pricing. Customers who arrive through AI may get the wrong expectations.

---

Rankings reflect the output of third-party AI assistants (ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, and Google AI Mode) on the dates measured. They are an observed, sourced measurement of how those assistants describe and rank each business, not an endorsement, certification, or rating by Courtyard. AI output changes over time and may be incomplete or inaccurate. Business names and descriptions are taken from the AI responses themselves.

Measured across ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, and Google AI Mode. Snapshot captured Fri Jul 17, 2026. An index by Courtyard.