# Which restaurants does AI recommend in Montréal, QC?

AI Visibility Index, week of Friday, July 17, 2026.

Across the 24 questions Montréal, QC customers ask AI about Restaurants, Mon Lapin is named most. 4 of 4 assistants recommend it, for a 5.1% share of voice, the week of Friday, July 17, 2026.

## Visibility: who AI recommends most

1. Mon Lapin: 5.1% share of voice, recommended by 4 of 4, depth 40/100
2. Restaurant Le Carré: 4.3% share of voice, recommended by 2 of 4, not depth-scored
3. Joe Beef: 4.3% share of voice, recommended by 4 of 4, depth 35/100
4. Le Club Chasse et Pêche: 2.9% share of voice, recommended by 4 of 4, not depth-scored
5. L'Express: 2.5% share of voice, recommended by 3 of 4, depth 51/100
6. Monarque: 2.1% share of voice, recommended by 4 of 4, depth 43/100
7. Aldea: 2.0% share of voice, recommended by 1 of 4, not depth-scored
8. BOUILLON BILK: 1.8% share of voice, recommended by 4 of 4, depth 38/100
9. Damas Restaurant: 1.6% share of voice, recommended by 4 of 4, not depth-scored
10. Restaurant La Toile: 1.5% share of voice, recommended by 1 of 4, not depth-scored
11. Le Filet: 1.4% share of voice, recommended by 3 of 4, not depth-scored
12. Maison Boulud: 1.3% share of voice, recommended by 4 of 4, not depth-scored
13. Cadet: 1.2% share of voice, recommended by 3 of 4, not depth-scored
14. Bar George: 1.2% share of voice, recommended by 3 of 4, not depth-scored
15. La Banquise: 1.1% share of voice, recommended by 4 of 4, depth 46/100
16. Beba: 1.0% share of voice, recommended by 3 of 4, not depth-scored
17. Le Violon: 1.0% share of voice, recommended by 3 of 4, not depth-scored
18. Sources: 0.9% share of voice, recommended by 1 of 4, not depth-scored
19. Lucille's Avenue des Canadiens: 0.8% share of voice, recommended by 2 of 4, not depth-scored
20. Venice Mtl Vieux-Montreal: 0.8% share of voice, recommended by 2 of 4, not depth-scored
21. Au Pied de Cochon: 0.8% share of voice, recommended by 4 of 4, not depth-scored
22. Le Majestique Montréal: 0.7% share of voice, recommended by 3 of 4, not depth-scored
23. Garde Manger: 0.7% share of voice, recommended by 3 of 4, depth 41/100
24. Stash Café: 0.7% share of voice, recommended by 3 of 4, not depth-scored
25. Le Mousso: 0.7% share of voice, recommended by 4 of 4, depth 33/100

## Depth: who AI understands best

Recommended ≠ understood. Joe Beef ranks #3 for visibility but #10 on depth. AI's weakest link for it is pricing. High visibility with low depth is the riskiest combination for a business: customers arrive, then get the wrong expectations.

1. Schwartz's Deli: depth 59/100 (visibility #27) · weak point: Pricing
2. L'Express: depth 51/100 (visibility #5) · weak point: Differentiation
3. La Banquise: depth 46/100 (visibility #15) · weak point: Pricing
4. Monarque: depth 43/100 (visibility #6) · weak point: Pricing
5. Vin Mon Lapin: depth 43/100 (visibility #42) · weak point: Pricing
6. Garde Manger: depth 41/100 (visibility #23) · weak point: Pricing
7. Restaurant Mastard: depth 40/100 (visibility #26) · weak point: Pricing
8. Mon Lapin: depth 40/100 (visibility #1) · weak point: Pricing
9. BOUILLON BILK: depth 38/100 (visibility #8) · weak point: Pricing
10. Joe Beef: depth 35/100 (visibility #3) · weak point: Pricing
11. Le Mousso: depth 33/100 (visibility #25) · weak point: Pricing

## Questions AI answers about Restaurants in Montréal, QC

## Frequently asked questions

### Which restaurant does AI recommend most in Montréal, QC?

Mon Lapin, named by 4 of the four assistants, for a 5.1% share of voice across the 24 prompts. Next are Restaurant Le Carré and Joe Beef.

### Which restaurant in Montréal, QC does AI understand best?

Schwartz's Deli scores highest on depth (59/100): assistants can accurately describe what it offers and help a customer toward a booking.

### Which restaurants in Montréal, QC is AI getting wrong?

Joe Beef ranks #3 by visibility but only #10 on depth. AI's weakest link for it is pricing. Customers who arrive through AI may get the wrong expectations.

---

Rankings reflect the output of third-party AI assistants (ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, and Google AI Mode) on the dates measured. They are an observed, sourced measurement of how those assistants describe and rank each business, not an endorsement, certification, or rating by Courtyard. AI output changes over time and may be incomplete or inaccurate. Business names and descriptions are taken from the AI responses themselves.

Measured across ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, and Google AI Mode. Snapshot captured Fri Jul 17, 2026. An index by Courtyard.